Share this article

Law Enforcement vs. Civilian Use-of-Force Training: What We Can—and Cannot—Teach

Why this article matters

Civilians and sworn officers live under very different legal frameworks. Police are empowered by statute to detain, arrest, and transport suspects; civilians are generally empowered to defend themselves or others—not to enforce compliance or take custody. Confusing those roles can turn a well-intended act into criminal charges (e.g., false imprisonment) or devastating civil liability. This guide explains the distinctions, what VALORTEC will (and won’t) teach civilians, and why. We anchor the discussion in nationally recognized standards and Florida-specific context where helpful. Legal Information Institute

Two different legal baselines

1) Law enforcement: “objective reasonableness” under the 4th Amendment

Use of force by police is evaluated under Graham v. Connor—the “objective reasonableness” standard that considers the facts from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, acknowledging split-second decisions. Deadly force to stop a fleeing suspect is constrained by Tennessee v. Garner, which permits it only when the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious injury. These cases shape agency policy, training, reporting, and review. Justia Law+1

2) Civilians: self-defense and defense-of-others under state law

Civilians don’t act as government agents. Their force decisions are judged under state self-defense statutes (imminence, proportionality, reasonableness) and limited doctrines like defense of others or property. Authority to seize or detain people is tightly restricted; overstepping can become assault, battery, or false imprisonment. Rules vary by state and evolve. (Example: Georgia repealed its broad citizen’s-arrest law in 2021; in Florida, proposed bills have sought to abrogate any common-law citizen’s-arrest authority.) Axios+2The Florida Senate+2

The authority gap: arrest powers vs. self-defense powers

• Arrest powers (police): Granted by statute (e.g., in Florida, Chapter 901 outlines when officers may arrest without a warrant), operationalized through POST/CJSTC academies, agency policy, and mandatory reporting. Officers are trained and authorized to detain by force, handcuff, search, transport, and, when lawful, to use intermediate and deadly force to effect an arrest. Online Sunshine

• Self-defense powers (civilians): Limited to stopping imminent unlawful threats and then disengaging or calling police. Civilians generally may not restrain or move a person except in narrow, state-specific circumstances (and the civil/criminal risk is high if they guess wrong). Legal Information Institute

Bottom line: Police training prepares officers to compel compliance and take people into custody. Civilian training prepares students to break contact safely and lawfully once a threat stops.

Why some techniques are reserved for sworn officers

VALORTEC does not—and will not—teach civilians techniques that presume arrest authority or that mainly exist to control and transport people. Examples include:

1. Handcuffing & custodial control tactics
   These are arrest tools. Teaching civilians how to handcuff, prone-out, and transition a subject to transport posture encourages detention, which, without lawful authority, risks false imprisonment allegations and serious injury/medical-care duties the civilian is not equipped to fulfill. Legal Information Institute

2. “Stop & hold” methods (compliance holds, cuffing chains, ground pins for custody)
   Officer defensive-tactics programs exist to operationalize a Response-to-Resistance matrix under agency policy, supervision, and insurance. Civilians don’t operate under those policies or immunities. Florida’s CJSTC curricula and agency policies show how tightly these techniques are embedded in arrest/custody workflows—not self-defense disengagement. de-escalate.org+1

3. Vehicle stop/interdiction tactics (e.g., high-risk stops, PIT maneuvers)
   These are mission-specific law-enforcement tasks with heavy legal and civil-liability overlays, taught only to sworn officers under strict policy and supervision. Civilians have no authority to detain motorists and attempting to do so can trigger criminal charges. IACP

4. Building entries for apprehension (“dynamic entries”)
   Designed for warrant service or exigent-circumstance arrests with multi-officer coordination. Civilians who copy these methods are likely committing criminal trespass or worse—and escalating risk far beyond lawful self-defense. (Agencies that authorize entry also mandate reporting and review of any force used.) IACP

5. Agency-policy weapons & restraints as compliance tools (baton/OC/CEW) for custody
   Even where civilians may possess certain tools under state law, using them to compel custody crosses into arrest-like activity. Agency policies and credentialing (POST/CJSTC) govern how officers use these tools within the response-to-resistance framework. Civilians lack that framework—and the legal authority behind it. Florida Department of Law Enforcement+1

What we do teach civilians (and why)

1. Threat recognition & decision thresholds
   You learn to recognize pre-assault cues, articulate imminence, and judge proportionality—the legal and tactical backbone of civilian defense. Your goal is to stop the threat and break contact, not to detain.

2. De-escalation, avoidance, and escape routes
   We train you to create distance, use cover, communicate assertively, and leave when safe—because your legal risk drops dramatically when you disengage promptly.

3. Defensive firearm use to stop imminent deadly force
   We integrate mechanics (draw, retention, movement, marksmanship) with scenario pressure so your decisions are lawful and necessary, not merely technically sound.

4. Post-incident procedures
   Calling 911, immediate first aid within your training, preserving evidence/witnesses, and what to expect when police arrive. (Officers have formal reporting duties after force; civilians do not—but your statements and actions will be scrutinized.) IACP

5. State-law awareness—not legal advice
   We brief the self-defense elements and point you to statutes and reputable legal resources, emphasizing that laws vary and change. (E.g., Florida agencies train under a CJSTC “Response to Resistance” matrix; civilians should understand that standard exists for police and doesn’t convert to arrest authority for citizens.) de-escalate.org

Common civilian questions answered

“Can I perform a ‘citizen’s arrest’?”
It depends on your state, and even then, it’s high-risk. Some states have narrowed or repealed it (Georgia did in 2021). Florida has no general statute authorizing citizen’s arrest and recent bills have sought to abolish any common-law version entirely. One bad judgment call can become false imprisonment. Our advice: call police and be a good witness unless you must act to prevent imminent harm. Legal Information Institute+3Axios+3The Florida Senate+3

“Why can officers use force I can’t?”
Because they’re empowered and required by law to detain and arrest. Their force is evaluated under Graham/Garner and detailed policy; yours is evaluated under self-defense statutes. Different roles, different rules, different liabilities. Justia Law+1

“Why won’t you teach me handcuffing and control holds?”
Those are custody tools, not self-defense tools. Teaching them invites civilians to detain—legally dangerous without arrest authority. We teach disengagement, not custody. Legal Information Institute

Inside the police training pipeline (and why it doesn’t translate to civilians)

In Florida and across the U.S., police academies operate under POST-type bodies (in Florida, CJSTC) that approve curricula, certify instructors, mandate defensive tactics, firearms, vehicle operations, and embed a formal Response-to-Resistance matrix. Agencies then layer on policies, scenario training, supervision, mandatory reporting, and after-action reviews. None of that applies to civilians—who also lack the statutory privileges to detain and transport. IACP+3Florida Department of Law Enforcement+3Broward College+3

Practical implications for your training plan

• If your goal is public safety and legal survivability, civilian training should prioritize avoidance, decisional clarity, and fast breaks—not prolonged engagements.

• If a class markets “apprehension” skills to civilians, that’s a red flag. Without agency authority and policies, those tactics import arrest-power risks to people who don’t have arrest powers.

• Integrate the law into your decision loops. The mechanics of shooting mean little if they’re deployed outside legal thresholds.

What VALORTEC promises

• Integrated, reality-based scenarios that test your judgment, not just your trigger press.

• Clear boundaries: what civilians can do to survive the encounter—and what crosses into arrest-only territory.

• Local-law awareness and referrals to qualified attorneys for state-specific legal questions.

• Documentation mindset (911 call structure, interaction with responding officers, immediate notes), because how you act after the incident matters.

Final word

Police and civilians face different missions. Officers must locate, confront, detain, and bring people to court—and the law gives them tools to do it, bounded by Graham and Garner, agency policy, and mandatory reporting. Civilians must survive, stop imminent harm, and disengage—bounded by state self-defense law and the ever-present risk of false imprisonment if they try to hold people. That’s why VALORTEC draws a hard line: we train civilians to win the fight and stay within the law, not to perform arrests. Justia Law+2Justia Law+2

Important disclaimer

This article is educational only and not legal advice. Laws change and vary by state. Consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction for specific guidance.

Ready to train the right way?

Train with VALORTEC in Orlando and across Florida. Our civilian programs blend biomechanics, decision-making under stress, and law-aware tactics—clear boundaries, no arrest-only techniques. Your safety and your freedom matter.

References & further reading

• Graham v. Connor—objective reasonableness standard for police use of force. Justia Law

• Tennessee v. Garner—limits on deadly force to detain fleeing suspects. Justia Law

• IACP National Consensus & reporting—policy expectations for agencies and officer force reporting. IACP+1

• Florida CJSTC/Response-to-Resistance—how officer force is trained and evaluated. de-escalate.org+2City of South Daytona, Florida+2

• Citizen’s arrest/false imprisonment—why civilian custody is legally risky; recent state changes. The Florida Senate+3Legal Information Institute+3Legal Information Institute+3